Solutions and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these types of systems. Via lie recognition tools tested at the boundary to a system for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being used by asylum applications. This article explores how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to navigate these systems and to pursue their right for safeguards.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from being able to access the stations of coverage. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are regimented by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: even though they aid to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions manufactured by non-governmental stars, and www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.